Election Thoughts
The election still seems forever away (and I can hardly believe the time to finally be rid of Bush will come very quickly) but obviously election preparation is already in full swing. Massive fund raisers and debates are occurring left and right before we've even got into the YEAR of the election. I'm guessing it's mostly a result of the fact that this is one of those elections where both candidates will be entirely new and not linked to the previous administration, but it's pretty crazy all the same.
And as I've talked with people on both ends of the political spectrum (as I love to do) I've discovered a whole wealth of interesting (and somewhat crazy opinions)
I had the frustration of talking to a Republican over dinner one night who I knew to be very educated (which was why I was willing to broach the subject of politics in the first place) only to be amazed as instead of giving any reasons for his personal political opinions by citing policy decisions or substantive political action, he fell back upon stereotype after stereotype about Bill and Hillary Clinton. He claimed Hillary would sell the country to China if elected, but would not explain what even made him think that (which, side note, is particularly amusing because as far as I understand things George W. Bush has technically already sold the country to China since he blew the surplus Clinton left and was so desperate to raise some money once he got ridiculously in the red that he sold most of our debt off to China in the form of T-bills) He also stated if Hillary was elected president there would no longer be any Constitution (in a tone as if everyone at the table understood exactly why that would be), but felt no need to back up a radical statement like that with any kind of facts, numbers, or incidents.
I don't believe that any president could ever get rid of the Constitution. A few, like our dear W, can seriously bend it and infringe a bit upon our civil liberties, but if someone were ever to come anywhere near having that as part of their platform, most of the voting electorate (there's always a few nut jobs out there) would NEVER even take them seriously.
Additionally this man compared the Civil War to the one in Iraq, but when I said I believed the difference was that in the Civil War we were fighting for a truly noble cause (among other things)-i.e. the abolition of slavery-and that I believed no one knew WHY we were fighting in Iraq, again he didn't have an answer.
Speaking of not having answers I also couldn't get him to tell me (nor any Republican I've met yet) why if Osama Bin Laden (who has NO link to Iraq) was the one who was responsible for the planes hitting the World Trade Center Towers which started the whole War on Terror in the first place, we were in Iraq and not still going after him, while Bin Laden continues to build up his base and strength again in Afghanistan. I know some people would reply that Al Qaeda is also in Iraq, but a recent U.S. Intelligence report has shown it wasn't there until after we invaded the country. In other words, it was able to form a base and strong presence there as a result of our actions.
He also said the word "liberals" (referring to most of the people he works with) like it was a dirty word.
What's wrong with us if people who are intelligent can't even carry on a conversation about politics without explaining why they feel the way they do or resorting to cheap partisan spite tactics. I'm tired of participating in political discourse where while I use the facts I know to support my side, the other side falls back on stereotypes and generalizations that they can't back up with any statistical evidence or news reports, while they talk about the other side in a disgusted and unbelieving voice. This is cheap, it is paltry, and it is unworthy of a true political debate or discussion.
I understand there are people on both sides who believe what they believe out of ignorance. They don't know much about politics and they've chosen a side to cling to that they back up with their own feelings and paranoia. I used to be like that and so were others I knew. But after we got an education, after we paid attention to the news and learned real facts and statistics about politics, we used those items to back up our new and improved views, whatever they may be. I'm not upset with people whose opinions have nothing to back them up if they are truly ignorant. Heck it's hard to care about politics as messed up as it is. I only hope eventually those people will have the opportunity to learn more and re-examine their beliefs based on what they've learned.
No the thing that gets me are people who have the education, have done the reading, hear the news, and still twist reality to reflect what they want to believe about it. They could easily marshal facts behind them but instead they're lazy and just use generalities and things commonly repeated by partisan parrots like Coulter and O'Reiley and Howard Stern to back up why they believe what they believe.
This needs to stop. Jon Stewart has made this plea before and that's coming from a comedian.
Intelligent people need to engage in intelligent discourse and back up their opinions with evidential material, not anecdotal types. Do you know most of the accusations thrown at Al Gore during his presidential campaign weren't true? He never said he created the internet (he merely said he was responsible for fronting the legislation to create it, which he was) he never claimed credit for Love Canal or that he and his wife were the main characters in "Love Story" (he admitted he was the inspiration for the male lead character, but said a paper had inaccurately claimed his wife was the inspiration as the female lead character. And he was in fact friends with the writer who has collaborated what Al said). Yet people repeat things like this over and over without even considering that it might not be true.
So to everyone out there who likes to talk about politics and has the benefit of an education and the ability to look things up to see if they're true or not, I'd like to make this plea. Elevate our public discourse. Don't parrot lies and false stories. Check your facts. That way we can all carry on a truly educated discussion, and not one based on paranoia and false stories. We have a responsibility as educated Americans to get these things right.
I make this request not as a staunch Republican or Democrat, but as an Independent who believes some issues shouldn't be politicized at all. Admittedly, I have my leanings as do most Independents (and I cannot deny that those tend to be liberal at least economically) At the moment I am a registered Democrat because (although the party has it's own problems) you have to be registered to vote in the primaries and at the moment I trust the Democratic party more than I do the Republican party. But I don't believe this might never change. Bill Clinton did a terrible thing when he had his affair, but I defend his presidency based on the simple facts that during his time in office the number of abortions went down, the number of adoptions went up, violent crime went down, we had the largest surplus we'd ever had, we had excellent diplomatic relations around the world, we did not loose an unacceptable number of troops to any mindless and goalless wars, and the economy was in excellent shape when he left office. I also defend Richard Nixon's presidency, though I admit he was involved in some shady dealings with Vietnam and his re-election, and his character can certainly be questioned (though he at least had the decency to resign when caught), but who it cannot be denied brought about some great things such as the EPA, world wide diplomacy that was unparalleled before his time, and the eventual end to the Vietnam War. I also don't believe in defending a president just because he is the same party as you. I am not a strong Republican but if I was I still would not defend Ronald Reagan, who's unacceptable support of authoritarian dictators who were often just as cruel as those under socialist governments (including putting into power Saddam Hussein because he was so afraid of the Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic rule;why did Bush never blame Reagan when talking about the horrible danger Saddam had become?), and who's personal paranoia of communism was forced upon the nation and helped spread it farther world wide, gripping hold of people to make them live in fear of countries like Russia, China, and Cuba, and who's Reaganomics it is highly debatable actually improved the economic status of our country. I also think it is unacceptable to defend someone who has had as terrible a presidency as George W. Bush, who by comparison makes Regan look like not so bad a president at least. Under the Bush presidency we have obtained the highest teen pregnancy rate in the world due to abstinence only education, poverty has sky rocketed, civil liberties are being overlooked in the name of hunting down terrorists, several million children (who cannot be responsible for being poor) are without proper health care, the response to Hurricane Katrina was inexcusably slow and a result of a disastrous refusal in the first place to strengthen the levies before it was too late, we have lost the respect of the international community, and we have lost absolutely unacceptable thousands of American and Iraqi troops and Iraqi non combatants in a war with no clear goal or purpose. Party supporters should never defend a clearly bad president just because he is a member of your party. Inexcusable is inexcusable be it Democrat, Republican, or Independent. Extreme abuse of power is not respective of party and it is always wrong. Every politician will always have some character flaw-politics is a dirty game-but there are always boundaries and always limits where the American people should admit behavior is no longer acceptable.
I am an American. As such I believe in the values of diplomacy, that working 40 hours a week or more should make it possible for you to live comfortably, that millions of Americans in poverty is unacceptable, and that war should only be resorted to if necessary and for a good and clear cause. I admire people like John Edwards, Bobby Kennedy, and Barrack Obama, but I also admire people like Colin Powel, and I admire the work Mitt Romney did in Massachusetts when he was governor and before he began to run for president. Heck, I even think the first President Bush didn't do that bad of a job. He had the guts to raise taxes when he knew it was necessary (proving fiscal responsibility is a part of the Republican Party platform that should be respected even if it goes against a campaign promise) and he managed to get in and out of Iraq without getting bogged down in the "quagmire" that a very different Dick Cheney had warned against. Republicans and Democrats should hold their leaders accountable to their party's values and to the citizens they govern. Personal responsibility should apply everywhere to everyone, especially people like George W. Bush who preach it for others but ignore it for themselves and their fellow party members.
The time for partisan spite is over. The time to come together as Americans and agree upon common values has arrived. We need to put aside arguing for arguing's sake and focus on getting things done. We need to ignore the parroted lies of partisan hate mongers like Sean Hannity and focus on what we believe this country is all about and what it should do to give equality to its citizens and to help the world.
I am also a Christian. As such I believe in the values of mercy, helping the poor, true justice regardless of class, and loving our fellow man. I also believe these values transcend my religion and are shared with Muslims, Mormons, Catholics, Hindus, Humanists, and others. The time for exclusion and looking at the world as black and white needs to be done away with. We need to love and heal and help.
I think that's what this country is truly all about. Not power plays and acting like the big kid on the block. Not ignoring the cries of the poor in our own country and across the seas. But kindness and the desire to make the world united and strong.
Jesus commanded us to love everyone, and I plan on doing that as best I can.